Research methods: Clinical studies based on routine laboratory tests

  • Shengping Yang Texas Tech University Health Science Center
  • Menfil Orellana-Barrios Texas Tech University Health Science Center http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7915-0567
  • Kenneth Nugent Texas Tech University Health Science Center

Abstract

Clinical research using routine laboratory tests can provide important opportunities to investigators, especially those with limited resources, and can improve patient care, especially if the result improves clinical decision making without the use of more sophisticated or expensive tests. Laboratory analysis of biological parameters can be used for screening, diagnostic testing, predicting prognosis, and measuring treatment responses. Often the same parameter can be used for several purposes, depending on the clinical scenario and the patient population. For example, several studies have suggested the mean platelet volume (MPV) is different in patients with acute coronary syndrome compared to patients with coronary disease but no acute syndrome. Given this information it might seem relatively easy to start studies using this laboratory test. However, multiple questions need to be considered before starting any research using MPV measurements. We will discuss some of these considerations in this review article. This approach applies to most research projects based on laboratory tests.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Vizioli L, Muscari S, Muscari A. The relationship of mean

platelet volume with the risk and prognosis of cardiovascular

diseases. Int J Clin Pract 2009;63:1509–15.

Cakici M, Cetin M, Balli M, et al. Predictors of thrombus

burden and no-reflow of infarct-related artery in patients

with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: importance

of platelet indices. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2014;

:709–15.

Sansanayudh N, Numthavaj P, Muntham D, et al. Prognostic

effect of mean platelet volume in patients with coronary

artery disease. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Thromb Haemost 2015;114:1299–309.

Li N, Yu Z, Zhang X, et al. Elevated mean platelet volume

predicts poor prognosis in colorectal cancer. Sci Rep 2017;

:10261.

Yang S, Berdine G. The receiver operating characteristic

(ROC) curve. Southwest Respiratory and Critical Care

Chronicles 2017;5(19):34–36.

Yang S, Berdine G. Categorical data analysis—logistic

regression. Southwest Respiratory and Critical Care Chronicles

;2(7):51–54.

Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and

variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample.

BMC Med Res Methodol 2005;5:13.

Wan X, Wang W, Liu J,et al. Estimating the sample mean and

standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or

interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014; 14:135.

Vránová J, Horák J, Krátká K, et al. Receiver operating

characteristic analysis and the cost–benefit analysis in determination

of the optimal cut-off point. Cas Lek Cesk 2009;

(9):410–5.

Fox J. Applied regression analysis, linear models, and related

methods. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc.

pp. 97–105.

Kumar TK. Multicollinearity in regression analysis. Rev

Econ Stat 1975;57(3):365–366.

Lancé MD, Sloep M, Henskens YM, et al. Mean platelet volume

as a diagnostic marker for cardiovascular disease: drawbacks

of preanalytical conditions and measuring techniques.

Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2012;18:561–8.

Latger-Cannard V, Hoarau M, Salignac S, et al. Mean platelet

volume: comparison of three analysers towards standardization

of platelet morphological phenotype. Int J Lab Hematol

;34:300–10.

Published
2018-04-18
How to Cite
Yang, S., Orellana-Barrios, M., & Nugent, K. (2018). Research methods: Clinical studies based on routine laboratory tests. The Southwest Respiratory and Critical Care Chronicles, 6(23), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.12746/swrccc.v6i23.459