Leila Laouar MD, Nadia Dammene Debbih MD, Sonia Nouioua MD
Corresponding author: Leila Laouar
Contact Information: Laouar_Leila@yahoo.fr
DOI: 10.12746/swjm.v14i58.1545
Hyperventilation syndrome (HVS) is a frequently overlooked complication in the aftermath of SARS-CoV-2 infection. We describe the case of a 53-year-old female dental surgeon who, several weeks after recovering from COVID-19, developed severe exertional dyspnea (mMRC grade 4), palpitations, and marked anxiety (HADS score 14/9). Despite normal findings on pulmonary function tests, chest computed tomography, and echocardiography, clinical suspicion was raised for HVS based on a high Nijmegen score (49/64) and the presence of hypocapnia (26.9 mmHg) on post-exercise arterial blood gas following a six-minute walk test (6MWT), which also revealed reduced exercise capacity (67% of predicted distance). A multidisciplinary management plan including respiratory physiotherapy, psychotherapy, and pharmacologic anxiolysis was implemented. Follow-up demonstrated significant symptom improvement and functional recovery, enabling a return to professional activity. This case underscores the relevance of considering HVS in the differential diagnosis of post-COVID dyspnea and illustrates the utility of simple tools such as the 6MWT and Nijmegen questionnaire in both diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring.
Keywords: Hyperventilation syndrome, post-COVID-19, Nijmegen questionnaire, hypocapnia, exercise testing.
Post-COVID-19 syndrome refers to the persistence of symptoms of varying severity following infection with SARS-CoV-2.1 Among these, chronic post-COVID dyspnea is a common complaint that requires a thorough investigation to exclude other potential causes such as respiratory disease, cardiovascular conditions, thromboembolic events, deconditioning, respiratory muscle involvement, or hyperventilation syndrome (HVS).2,3 This syndrome is defined as a set of somatic symptoms resulting from inappropriate excessive ventilation, which can be partially or fully reproduced through voluntary hyperventilation.4 The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms remain controversial. Despite the wide range of somatic and psychological symptoms it may provoke due to physiologically inappropriate hyperventilation, the syndrome is often overlooked.5,6
Post-COVID-19 HVS appears to be a frequent occurrence, affecting approximately 15.6% of survivors according to Cherif et al., with suggestive evidence of a significant psychosomatic component.7
Diagnosing HVS can be challenging and requires recognizing often misleading symptoms, performing suggestive diagnostic tests, and ruling out other etiological factors. Although no gold standard for diagnosis exists, a combination of clinical history, the Nijmegen questionnaire.8 and the hyperventilation provocation test constitutes a robust diagnostic approach. Despite its extremely low mortality, diagnosing HVS remains crucial, as chronic hyperventilation significantly impairs social and occupational quality of life and is amenable to rehabilitative interventions.9,10
The initial illness occurred several months prior and was characterized by anosmia, dry cough, moderate fever, and paroxysmal shortness of breath. Clinical examination revealed a respiratory rate of 20 breaths/min, heart rate of 100 beats/min, oxygen saturation (SpO2) of 98% on room air, blood pressure of 97/60 mmHg, and normal pulmonary auscultation. The SARS-CoV-2 PCR test was positive. Chest computed tomography (CT) showed 10% ground-glass opacities, with no features suggestive of severity.
Biological investigations revealed no leukocytosis, moderate lymphopenia (1,000 cells/mm³), normal renal and liver function tests, and D-dimer levels within the reference range.
The treatment regimen included antibiotics, analgesics, vitamins C and D, zinc, and magnesium supplementation.
The clinical course was marked by resolution of the fever and disappearance of the cough, but persistent resting dyspnea remained, despite a normal physical examination and follow-up chest CT showing complete resolution of the initial lesions without new abnormalities.
Two months after the acute COVID-19 episode, the patient continued to experience persistent dyspnea, described as progressive breathlessness occurring at rest and becoming markedly disabling. This was associated with uncomfortable palpitations and profound fatigue, which significantly impaired her quality of life.
She also reported two episodes of near syncope at work, which she attributed to enclosed environments and prolonged mask use suggestive of contextual hypersensitivity to stressful and confined settings.
A specialized psychiatric evaluation ruled out social phobia but revealed a persistent anxiety state, likely related to her post-infectious experience and pre-existing emotional vulnerability.
Notably, her dyspnea improved during morning walks outdoors, especially near the sea, suggesting a functional or psychogenic component to the clinical picture.
Professionally, she had suspended her practice twice due to the severity of her symptoms and their impact on her functional capacity. She had been on medical leave for 45 days at the time of evaluation, reflecting significant social and occupational dysfunction.
The six-minute walk test (6MWT) revealed a walking distance of 399 meters, corresponding to 67% of the predicted value, without oxygen desaturation. However, the test induced tachypnea (29 breaths/min) and tachycardia (141 bpm), both clinically well-tolerated without the need to interrupt the test.
A second arterial blood gas sample, drawn immediately after exercise, showed hyperoxia (PaO2 101.4 mmHg) and hypocapnia (PaCO2 26.9 mmHg), with normal pH and bicarbonate levels (see Table 1). Post-exercise questioning revealed reproduction of typical hyperventilation symptoms: palpitations, shallow inspiratory dyspnea, and perioral paresthesias.
Table 1. Laboratory and Functional Assessment
| Examinations | Parameters | Unit | Reference Range | Results | Comments |
| Biology | WBC | 103/mm3 | 04–10 | 7,3 | Normal |
| RBC | 106/mm3 | 3,6–5,8 | 4,6 | Normal | |
| Hb | g/dl | 12–16 | 12,7 | Normal | |
| Platelets | 103/mm3 | 150–400 | 290 | Normal | |
| Urea | g/l | 0,15–0,45 | 0,19 | Normal | |
| Creatinie | mg/dl | 07–14 | 9,84 | Normal | |
| Blood Glucose | g/dl | 1,03 | 0,70–1,10 | Normal | |
| D-dimers | mg/ml | <500 | 370 | Normal | |
| TSHus | uU/ml | 0,25–4,67 | 2,17 | Normal | |
| Baseline Spirometry | FVC | Litres | 4,38 | 4,11 | 94% of predicted |
| FEV1 | L/s | 3,54 | 3,63 | 102% of predicted | |
| FEV1/FVC ratio (Tiffeneau Index) | % | 81,41 | 88,36 | Normal | |
| Arterial Blood Gas – Rest | ph | 7,35–7,45 | 7.42 | Normal | |
| PaO2 | mmHg | >85 | 91,7 | Normal | |
| PaCO2 | mmHg | 35–45 | 38,3 | Normal | |
| HCO3– | mmol/L | 22–28 | 25,6 | Normal | |
| SaO2 | % | 95–100 | 98,1 | Normal | |
| Arterial Blood Gas – Post-exercise (6MWT) | ph | 7,35–7,45 | 7,51 | Elevated (alkalosis) | |
| PaO2 | mmHg | >85 | 101,4 | Hyperoxia | |
| PaCO2 | mmHg | 35–45 | 26,9 | Hypocapnia | |
| HCO3– | mmol/L | 22–28 | 21,3 | Decreased | |
| SaO2 | % | 95–100 | 98,5 | Normal | |
| 6MWT | meters | 597 (predicted) | 399 | 67% predicted distance | |
WBC: White Blood Cells; RBC: Red Blood Cells; Hb: Hemoglobin; FVC: Forced Vital Capacity; FEV1: Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second; IT: Tiffeneau Index; PaO2: Arterial Partial Pressure of Oxygen; PaCO2: Arterial Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide; HCO3–: Bicarbonate Ion Concentration; SaO2: Arterial Oxygen Saturation; TSHus: Ultrasensitive Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone; 6MWT: Six-Minute Walk Test.
Given the persistent disabling dyspnea, the high Nijmegen score, and the absence of cardiorespiratory or metabolic abnormalities, a diagnosis of hyperventilation syndrome (HVS) was considered likely. The patient was informed of this diagnosis, which was explained as a physiological and functional dysregulation potentially triggered or maintained by emotional, post-infectious, and behavioral factors.
A multidisciplinary therapeutic plan was proposed and initiated, including:
The patient adhered strictly to the program, with sessions scheduled twice weekly for three weeks, followed by a reassessment.
At follow-up, the patient reported a marked improvement in symptoms, including less frequent palpitations and dyspnea, improved tolerance to daily activities, and a return to part-time professional activity. A repeat six-minute walk test showed a slight improvement in distance (420 meters) and normalization of respiratory and cardiac parameters post-exercise, with no recurrence of hypocapnia. The Nijmegen score decreased to 29/64 (Table 2).
Table 2. Evolution of Clinical and Biological Parameters Under Treatment
| Paramtes | Initial | Day 7 | Day 14 | Day 21 | Day 30 |
| mMRC scale parameters (Dyspnea) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| HADs (Anxiety/Depression) | 13/9 | 13/8 | 10/8 | 10/9 | 10/7 |
| Nijmegen score | 49/64 | 49/64 | 34/64 | 28/64 | 18/64 |
| 6MWT Distance (meters) | 399 (67%) | 367 (61%) | 410 (69%) | 490 (82%) | 497 (83%) |
| Arterial blood gas at Day 30 | |||||
| ph | PaO2 | PaCO2 | HCO3– | SaO2 | |
| 7,39 | 97 mmHg | 39 mmHg | 24 mmol/l | 98 | |
HADs: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; mMRC: modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea; 6MWT: Six-Minute Walk Test.
The patient’s quality of life improved significantly, as reflected in a reduction of the HADS anxiety score from 14 to 9, and she resumed her professional duties in full, albeit with adjustments to workload and stress management.
Post-COVID-19 sequelae both organic and functional are increasingly reported in the literature, particularly in terms of respiratory impairment. However, certain persistent symptoms, such as chronic dyspnea despite normal thoracic imaging, remain unexplained and necessitate the exploration of alternative diagnoses, including cardiac sequelae and hyperventilation syndrome (HVS).1,2 Interestingly, the risk factors for post-COVID HVS appear to contrast with those of severe acute COVID-19. While severe forms are more prevalent among older males with comorbidities such as obesity and cardiovascular disease, HVS after COVID-19 typically affects younger, active women with no history of cardiopulmonary disease, often following mild infection and in the presence of an anxious or emotionally vulnerable background.11–13
In its classic presentation, HVS primarily affects young, professionally active individuals—especially women. A triggering event, often acute or chronic psychological stress, initiates inappropriate hyperventilation, leading to dyspnea due to respiratory muscle overuse. This symptom becomes a source of anxiety, perpetuating a vicious cycle of hyperventilation and anxiety. Psychiatric comorbidities such as anxiety and depression are frequently associated with HVS, further complicating its recognition and management.13
Clinically, HVS presents with cardiorespiratory symptoms (dyspnea, sighing, yawning, chest pain, palpitations) as well as systemic and neurovegetative signs (fatigue, dizziness, cognitive impairment, paresthesia, muscle cramps), many of which overlap with symptoms seen in both acute and long COVID syndromes.14–16 ECG changes, visual disturbances, tinnitus, tremors, migraines, or even muscle spasms may also occur.
Our case is consistent with this profile: a middle-aged female with a long-standing anxiety disorder following a traumatic personal loss, who experienced mild COVID-19 and subsequently developed persistent, unexplained symptoms. Her clinical picture was dominated by cardiorespiratory manifestations and profound asthenia, with no structural abnormalities, prompting a diagnostic orientation toward post-COVID HVS.
The classical approach to assessing dysfunctional breathing relies on clinical assessment and validated screening tools such as the Nijmegen Questionnaire (NQ).17 Originally developed for detecting HVS, the NQ comprises 16 items, each rated from 0 (never) to 4 (very often), assessing symptoms such as dyspnea, dizziness, paresthesia, and palpitations, for a maximum score of 64. A score of ≥23/64 is strongly suggestive of HVS, with a reported sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 95% in populations without known respiratory disease18 It is important to note that the NQ does not assess the severity or progression of HVS, but only the likelihood of its presence. In our case, the patient’s score was 49/64, significantly above the diagnostic threshold. Furthermore, the questionnaire revealed symptoms the patient did not spontaneously report, considering them unimportant or unrelated. Thus, the NQ helped uncover functional symptoms and supported the diagnostic hypothesis of post-COVID HVS.
Respiratory provocation tests aim to reproduce at least two symptoms listed in the NQ, thereby increasing diagnostic confidence.19 Various techniques can be used to assess ventilatory response:
Arterial blood gas (PaCO2), Transcutaneous capnography (e.g., earlobe), End-tidal CO2 (PETCO2) via nasal capnograph20
In HVS, hypocapnia (low PaCO2) is a typical finding, resulting from excessive ventilation and thought to be responsible for many functional symptoms. While resting ABG may be normal in the absence of a current hyperventilation episode, exercise-induced ABG abnormalities can be revealing.
Contraindications to provocation testing include ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, hypercapnic respiratory failure, and sickle cell disease (due to thrombosis risk). In this case, provocation tests could not be performed due to equipment unavailability.
Voluntary Hyperventilation Test (HVPT) involves guided over breathing for several minutes and evaluating whether typical HVS symptoms are provoked. Though its sensitivity and specificity remain imperfectly established, many authors consider it a useful diagnostic tool21
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET) may help diagnose HVS in patients who show preserved capacity but evidence of relative deconditioning.22 Common ventilatory findings include Effort-induced hypocapnia: Rapid shallow breathing, Mouth breathing, Lack of end-expiratory pause.22,23
A comparative study showed that HVPT is superior to CPET in reproducing HVS symptoms, suggesting it is more effective in provoking the characteristic clinical picture.24
Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), although not validated for diagnosing HVS, provides a reliable and reproducible assessment of submaximal exercise capacity, integrating cardiovascular, respiratory, and muscular responses25 It is widely used in chronic respiratory disease evaluation and rehabilitation follow-up.
In our case, due to lack of capnography and rehabilitation facilities, the 6MWT was used to:
This revealed exercise-induced hypocapnia, confirming hyperventilation. In addition, the patient reported recurrence of multiple Nijmegen-related symptoms post-exercise, further supporting the diagnosis of exercise-induced HVS in the post-COVID context.
Hyperventilation syndrome (HVS) is a frequent manifestation in the post-COVID-19 period and may present as disabling chronic dyspnea. In the presence of suggestive clinical symptoms, and after ruling out pulmonary, vascular, or cardiac pathology, the diagnosis primarily relies on the Nijmegen Questionnaire and the voluntary hyperventilation test. However, HVS is often diagnosed late due to the complex interplay between post-COVID syndrome and functional breathing disorders, as well as the limited availability of highly specialized diagnostic centers. This diagnostic delay frequently leads to significant patient anxiety and results in numerous costly, sometimes invasive investigations with limited diagnostic yield.
While capnography remains the gold standard for detecting abnormal ventilatory patterns and hypocapnia, its availability is restricted in many healthcare facilities. In this context, the six-minute walk test (6MWT), commonly employed in pulmonary and cardiopulmonary evaluation, followed by arterial blood gas analysis, may offer a pragmatic and promising alternative for identifying post-exercise hypocapnia and supporting the diagnosis of post-COVID HVS.
Article citation: Laouar L, Debbih ND, Nouioua S. Hyperventilation syndrome following mild COVID-19 in a health care worker. The Southwest Journal of Medicine. 2026;14(58):30–36
From: Youcef El Khatib University of Health Sciences, Algiers, Algeria (LL, NDD, SN)
Conflicts of interest: none
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.