The efficacy of Polaroid photography in documenting dermatological treatment progression in resource-limited settings

  • Dora Ryan Goldstein Texas Tech University Health Science Center El Paso
  • Kritin Verma Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, School of Medicine
  • Kelly Bennett Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
  • Fiona Prabhu Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
  • Seemal R. Desai University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
  • Daniel P. Friedmann Westlake Dermatology Clinical Research Center, Westlake Dermatology & Cosmetic Surgery
  • Sabrina C. Camacho Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
  • Alba Posligua Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
  • Cameron E. West Genzada Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Hutchinson
  • Michelle B. Tarbox Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center

Abstract

Accurate documentation of dermatological conditions is critical for assessing therapy efficacy, especially in free clinics where provider continuity and electronic health records (EHRs) are often unavailable. Polaroid instant photography offers a practical solution by providing tactile, confidential evidence that bridges the gap left by digital systems, which may be inaccessible or pose privacy risks. Serial photography with Polaroid cameras enables reliable monitoring of disorders such as psoriasis, vitiligo, and chronic ulcers, reducing diagnostic errors and facilitating clear inter-provider communication. While Polaroid images are best suited for larger lesions and pigmentary conditions, they offer advantages in patient confidentiality and ease of integration into paper-based workflows. Standardization of imaging protocols and secure handling of physical photographs are essential for maximizing benefits. Despite limitations such as cost and image durability, Polaroid photography presents a viable alternative in resource-limited settings, where it can significantly improve documentation quality over textual notes alone. Future research should evaluate its impact on diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes in underserved populations.

Keywords: Polaroid photography, dermatology, free clinics, patient confidentiality, serial imaging

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Kelly Bennett, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center

Department of Family Medicine 

Fiona Prabhu, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center

Department of Family Medicine 

Seemal R. Desai, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Department of Dermatology

Alba Posligua, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center

Department of Dermatology 

Michelle B. Tarbox, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center

Department of Dermatology 

References

1) Kashetsky N, Mar K, Liu C, Rivers JK, Mukovozov I. Photography and Image Acquisition in Dermatology a Scoping Review: Techniques for High-Quality Photography. Dermatol Surg. 2023;49(9):877-884. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000003864
2) Wongvibulsin S, Feterik K. Recommendations for Better Adoption of Medical Photography as a Clinical Tool. Interact J Med Res. 2022;11(2):e36102. Published 2022 Jul 18. doi:10.2196/36102
3) Witmer WK, Lebovitz PJ. Clinical photography in the dermatology practice. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2012;31(3):191-199. doi:10.1016/j.sder.2012.06.004
4) Henderson GA, Greaves M. The polaroid camera in clinical dermatology. Med Biol Illus. 1968;18(4):246-248.
5) Olmstead CB. Instant color print photography in dermatology. Cutis. 1982;29(6):585-590.
Published
2026-07-07