Comparison of the shock index, modified shock index, and age shock index in adult admissions to a tertiary hospital

  • David Sotello
  • Shengping Yang
  • Kenneth Nugent
Keywords: shock index, age shock index, modified shock index, outcomes


Background: Multiple variables interact constantly to maintain the hemodynamic status
of patients. The shock index (SI), the modified shock index (MSI), and the age shock index
(ASI) have been studied in different clinical settings to predict hemodynamic instability and
associated outcomes. These indices are calculated from simple hemodynamic parameters,
are non-invasive, and represent no additional expense. We wanted to analyze the performance
of these three different indices in the patients admitted to our hospital.
Methods: We performed a retrospective study in which we identified all adult patients
(>18 years, <89 years) admitted to the University Medical Center in Lubbock, Texas, from
10/01/2015 until 9/30/2016. We collected basic clinical information, including age, initial
blood pressure measurements, discharge diagnoses, length of stay (LOS), and mortality.
With these variables we calculated for each patient the admission SI (defined as heart rate/
systolic blood pressure), MSI (heart rate/mean arterial pressure), and ASI (age × SI). We
separated the patients according to their admission diagnoses and calculated the median and
25th–75th percentiles for those parameters. We also compared mortality and LOS based on
their admission SI using two different cutoff points at 0.7 and 1.0, their admission MSI (cutoff:
1.3), and their ASI (cutoff: 50).
Results: A total of 18,478 adult patients admitted to our institution were included in this
study. The median age was 53 years, the median LOS was 4 days, and the overall mortality
was 3.8%. The median SI was 0.67; 43.3% of patients had an SI > 0.7 and 8.11% had an
SI > 1.0. The median SI calculated for the patients with sepsis was 0.88; this was higher than the
rest of admission diagnoses (p < 0.001). The mortality of the patients with an SI > 0.7 was 5.1%
and with SI > 1.0 was 11.3% (p < 0.001). When comparing the MSI, those with an MSI > 1.3 had
a mortality of 10.3%, and those with an ASI > 50 had a mortality of 10.0% (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: The SI, MSI, and ASI are non-invasive calculations that may provide useful
information when triaging patients early during admission. The diagnosis of sepsis results in a
higher median SI, which may represent better prediction in outcomes compared with the rest
of admission diagnoses. In our study, the three indexes performed equally. Since the SI with
a cut-off of 1.0 identified patients with higher mortality risk, we would recommend using this
cut-off instead of 0.7.


Download data is not yet available.


Allgöwer M, Burri C. Shock index. Dtsch Med Wochenschr


Rassameehiran S, Teerakanok J, Suchartlikitwong S, et al.

Utility of the shock index for risk stratification in patients

with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. South Med J 2017;


Schroll R, Swift D, Tatum D, et al. Accuracy of shock index

versus ABC score to predict need for massive transfusion in

trauma patients. Injury 2018 Jan;49(1):15–19.

Kim SY, Hong KJ, Shin SD, et al. Validation of the shock

index, modified shock index, and age shock index for predicting

mortality of geriatric trauma patients in emergency

departments. J Korean Med Sci 2016;31:2026–2032.

Tseng J, Nugent K. Utility of the shock index in patients

with sepsis. Am J Med Sci 2015 Jun;349(6):531–5.

Balhara KS, Hsieh YH, Hamade B, et al. Clinical metrics

in emergency medicine: the shock index and the probability

of hospital admission and inpatient mortality. Emerg Med J


Zhang X, Wang Z, Wang Z, et al. The prognostic value of

shock index for the outcomes of acute myocardial infarction

patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine

(Baltimore) 2017;96:e8014.

McCall SJ, Musgrave SD, Potter JF, et al. Clinical Network

Evaluation Study (ASCNES) Group. The shock index

predicts acute mortality outcomes in stroke. Int J Cardiol


Nathan HL, El Ayadi A, Hezelgrave NL, et al. Shock index:

an effective predictor of outcome in postpartum haemorrhage?.

BJOG 2015;122:268–75.

Yu T, Tian C, Song J, et al. Age shock index is superior to

shock index and modified shock index for predicting longterm

prognosis in acute myocardial infarction. Shock 2017;


Zarzaur BL, Croce MA, Fischer PE, et al. New vitals after

injury: shock index for the young and age x shock index for

the old. J Surg Res 2008 Jun 15;147(2):229–36.

Terceros-Almanza LJ, García-Fuentes C, Bermejo-Aznárez

S, et al. Prediction of massive bleeding. Shock index and

modified shock index. Med Intensiva 2017;41:532–538.

Liu YC, Liu JH, Fang ZA, et al. Modified shock index and

mortality rate of emergency patients. World J Emerg Med


Torabi M, Moeinaddini S, Mirafzal A, et al. Shock index,

modified shock index, and age shock index for prediction of

mortality in Emergency Severity Index level 3. Am J Emerg

Med 2016 Nov;34(11):2079–2083.

How to Cite
Sotello, D., Yang, S., & Nugent, K. (2019). Comparison of the shock index, modified shock index, and age shock index in adult admissions to a tertiary hospital. The Southwest Respiratory and Critical Care Chronicles, 7(28), 18-23.